Published: Vol 7, Iss 7, Apr 5, 2017 DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.2211 Views: 22119
Reviewed by: Longping Victor TseRajesh B. ThippeshappaAnonymous reviewer(s)
Protocol Collections
Comprehensive collections of detailed, peer-reviewed protocols focusing on specific topics
Related protocols
Protocol for Generation of Single-Gene Knockout in Hard-to-Transfect THP1 Cell Lines Using CRISPR/Cas9
Kaveri Srivastava and Bhaswati Pandit
Jul 5, 2025 1640 Views
Reprogramming White Fat Cells for Adipose Manipulation Transplantation (AMT) Therapy
Kelly An [...] Nadav Ahituv
Aug 5, 2025 1076 Views
Assembly and Mutagenesis of Human Coronavirus OC43 Genomes in Yeast via Transformation-Associated Recombination
Brett A. Duguay and Craig McCormick
Aug 20, 2025 1197 Views
Abstract
The programmable Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)-associated nuclease 9 (Cas9) technology revolutionized genome editing by providing an efficient way to cut the genome at a desired location (Ledford, 2015). In mammalian cells, DNA lesions trigger the error-prone non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) DNA repair mechanism. However, in presence of a DNA repair template, Homology-Directed Repair (HDR) can occur leading to precise repair of the lesion site. This last process can be exploited to enable precise knock-in changes by introducing the desired genomic alteration on the repair template. In this protocol we describe the delivery of long repair templates (> 200 nucleotides) using recombinant Adeno Associated Virus (rAAV) for CRISPR-Cas9-based knock-in of a C-terminal tag sequence in a human cell line.
Keywords: CRISPR-Cas9Background
Despite numerous reports on knock-out model systems generated by CRISPR-Cas9, knock-in reports are still lagging behind. Because of the many applications, generating knock-in cell lines remains an obvious goal of genome editing. The introduction of knock-in alterations generally relies on the presence of a repair template DNA and activation of the HDR repair mechanism after a site-specific double strand (ds)DNA break is introduced in the genome close to the site of alteration. Different templates can be delivered to the repair machinery ranging from a classical linearized vector containing extensive homology regions and an optional selection cassette, to single strand (ss)DNA oligonucleotides of about 200 nucleotides (Chen et al., 2011). Although ssDNA oligonucleotides are a popular tool, they can only be used to introduce small alterations such as mutations or epitope tags because of DNA synthesis limitations. In addition, the lack of a selection cassette requires robust screening strategies to identify correct clones as no selective pressure is applied on the HDR process. Successful use of integration-deficient rAAV for homologous recombination was already shown before the availability of tailored nucleases (Khan et al., 2011). Both its efficient delivery and ssDNA genome make rAAV a powerful tool to deliver donor repair templates for homologous recombination. Moreover, the secondary structures at the end of the ssDNA molecule block exonuclease activity and stabilize the donor DNA. Even without the use of specific nucleases, knock-in efficiencies of up to 0.7% were obtained in fibroblasts cells (Russell and Hirata, 1998), which was further increased by introducing selection cassettes.
By combining CRISPR-Cas9 with rAAV-mediated repair template delivery, knock-in cell lines can be generated in a robust manner with efficiencies well beyond 50% when selection cassettes are used. This protocol describes the complete procedure for epitope tagging of a gene of choice in the HCT116 colon carcinoma cell line using CRISPR-Cas9 and rAAV. A timeline for the complete experimental procedure is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Timeline for the generation of a knock-in cell line using CRISPR-Cas9 and rAAV-assisted repair template delivery. Dotted timespans indicate periods of incubation or expansion, requiring limited to no hands-on time.
Materials and Reagents
Equipment
Procedure
10x AccuPrime Pfx reaction mix | 5 µl |
Forward primer (10 µM) | 1.5 µl |
Reverse primer (10 µM) | 1.5 µl |
AccuPrime Pfx DNA polymerase | 0.5 µl |
gDNA (100 ng/µl) | 1 µl |
ddH2O | 40.5 µl |
pAAV targeting construct (1 µg/µl) | 15 µl |
pDG (1 µg/µl) | 30 µl |
2.5 M CaCl2 | 75 µl |
ddH2O | 630 µl |
FugeneHD mix | DNA mix | ||
Opti-MEM | 11.7 µl | Opti-MEM | 11.7 µl |
Fugene HD transfection reagent | 1.4 µl | Cas9 + gRNA plasmid DNA | 0.5 µg |
15 min | 55 °C |
45 min | 85 °C |
∞ | 4 °C |
5x Colorless GoTaq Flexi buffer | 4 µl |
5’HR Fwd primer (100 µM) | 0.15 µl |
5’HR Rev primer (100 µM) | 0.15 µl |
dNTP’s (25 mM each) | 0.2 µl |
MgCl2 (25 mM) | 1.2 µl |
DMSO | 1.2 µl |
ddH2O | 10.9 µl |
GoTaq (5 U/µl) | 0.2 µl |
Lysis material | 2µl |
5x Colorless GoTaq Flexi buffer | 4 µl |
3’HR Fwd primer (100 µM) | 0.15 µl |
3’HR Rev primer (100 µM) | 0.15 µl |
dNTP’s (25 mM each) | 0.2 µl |
MgCl2 (25 mM) | 1.2 µl |
DMSO | 1.2 µl |
ddH2O | 10.9 µl |
GoTaq (5 U/µl) | 0.2 µl |
Lysis material | 2 µl |
5x Colorless GoTaq Flexi buffer | 4 µl |
CR Fwd primer (100 µM) | 0.15 µl |
CR Rev primer (100 µM) | 0.15 µl |
dNTP’s (25 mM each) | 0.2 µl |
MgCl2 (25 mM) | 1.2 µl |
DMSO | 1.2 µl |
ddH2O | 10.9 µl |
GoTaq (5 U/µl) | 0.2 µl |
Lysis material | 2 µl |
10x AccuPrime Pfx reaction mix | 5 µl |
SBDT forward primer (10 µM) | 1.5 µl |
SBDT reverse primer (10 µM) | 1.5 µl |
AccuPrime Pfx DNA polymerase (2.5 U/μl) | 0.5 µl |
rAAV targeting construct (1 ng/µl) | 10 µl |
ddH2O | 31.5 µl |
SBDT Fwd primer | 5’-TGCTCCTGCCGAGAAAGTAT-3’ |
SBDT Rev primer | 5’-GCGATGCAATTTCCTCATTT-3’ |
Template DNA (50 ng/µl) | 1 µl |
Random primer | 2 µl |
ddH2O | 11 µl |
10x buffer | 2.5 µl |
dNTP mix (0.2 mM each) | 2.5 µl |
[α-32P] dCTP (50 µCi) | 5 µl |
Exo-free Klenow enzyme | 1 µl |
gDNA (500 ng/µl) | 20 µl |
SuRE/Cut buffer H | 3 µl |
0.1% BSA | 0.3 µl |
EcoRI (40 U/µl) | 0.5 µl |
H2O | 6.2 µl |
Depurination buffer | 10 min |
Denaturation buffer | 2 x 15 min |
Neutralization buffer | 2 x 15 min |
20x SSC | 10 min |
Wash buffer 1 | 10 min |
Wash buffer 2 | 15 min |
Wash buffer 3 | 10 min |
M13 forward | 5’-TGTAAAACGACGGCCAGT-3’ |
M13 reverse | 5’-CAGGAAACAGCTATGACC-3’ |
Data analysis
Recipes
Acknowledgments
G.V. is a PhD student supported by the Fund for Scientific Research – Flanders (FWO) (grant 3G050913N). S.E. acknowledges support from FWO (grants G011312N and 3G050913N). Cell lines constructed using this protocol were described in ‘An extra dimension in protein tagging by quantifying universal proteotypic peptides using targeted proteomics’ by Vandemoortele et al. (2016) and ‘Intelligent mixing of proteomes for elimination of false positives in affinity purification-mass spectrometry’ by Eyckerman et al. (2016), doi:10.1038/srep27220 and doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00517 respectively.
References
Article Information
Copyright
© 2017 The Authors; exclusive licensee Bio-protocol LLC.
How to cite
Vandemoortele, G., De Sutter, D. and Eyckerman, S. (2017). Robust Generation of Knock-in Cell Lines Using CRISPR-Cas9 and rAAV-assisted Repair Template Delivery. Bio-protocol 7(7): e2211. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.2211.
Category
Molecular Biology > DNA > Mutagenesis
Molecular Biology > DNA > DNA recombination
Cell Biology > Cell engineering > CRISPR-cas9
Do you have any questions about this protocol?
Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.
Tips for asking effective questions
+ Description
Write a detailed description. Include all information that will help others answer your question including experimental processes, conditions, and relevant images.
Share
Bluesky
X
Copy link