Abstract
Ribosome footprinting, or Ribo-seq, has revolutionized the studies of translation. It was originally developed for yeast and mammalian cells in culture (Ingolia et al., 2009). Herein, we describe a plant-optimized hands-on ribosome footprinting protocol derived from previously published procedures of polysome isolation (Ingolia et al., 2009; Mustroph et al., 2009) and ribosome footprinting (Ingolia et al., 2009; Ingolia et al., 2013). With this protocol, we have been able to successfully isolate and analyze high-quality ribosomal footprints from different stages of in vitro grown Arabidopsis thaliana plants (dark-grown seedlings [Merchante et al., 2015] and 13-day-old plantlets in plates and plants grown in liquid culture [unpublished results]).
Background
The central role of translation in modulating gene activity has long been recognized, yet the systematic exploration of quantitative changes in translation at a genome-wide scale in response to a specific stimulus has only recently become technically feasible. The ribosome footprinting technology (often known as the Ribo-seq), developed originally for yeast and mammalian cells in culture, has revolutionized the studies of translation regulation and gene expression, as it allows to determine the exact positions of the ribosomes at a genome-wide scale and at a single-codon resolution (Ingolia et al., 2009).
Prior to the development of Ribo-seq, the most common methods employed to study translation regulation in plants were the isolation of polysomal RNA via sucrose gradient centrifugation or translating ribosome affinity purification (TRAP) followed by Northern blotting, qRT-PCR, microarrays, or RNA-seq. The first method, known as polysome profiling, relies on resolving distinct polysomal fractions on a sucrose gradient via ultracentrifugation (Branco-Price et al., 2008; Missra and von Arnim, 2014; Li et al., 2015). By comparing different plant growth conditions or mutants, one could infer the changes in the rates of translation from observing a shift in the distribution of mRNAs between polysomal fractions. For example, if a transcript becomes more abundant in the monosomal fraction with the concomitant decrease in the higher order polysomes, the translation of this mRNA is considered as down-regulated. The key limitation of this technique, however, is its low resolution of higher-order polysomes (and thus mild quantitative changes in translation are often missed) and the inability to differentiate between polysomal RNAs that undergo active translation versus are loaded with arrested ribosomes (for example, those ‘stuck’ in the upstream open reading frames of a transcript). The second polysomal RNA isolation technique, TRAP, is based on the stable expression of an epitope-tagged ribosomal protein followed by the immunoprecipitation of entire ribosomes along with their associated mRNAs (Zanneti et al., 2005; Reynoso et al., 2015). While this latter method accommodates both global and tissue-specific studies of translation (achieved by driving the expression of a tagged ribosomal protein in a ubiquitous versus tissue-specific manner), its use is limited to transformable species where transgenic lines can be generated. Furthermore, transcriptomic analysis of TRAP samples per se does not provide a quantitative measure of translation (unless coupled with Ribo-seq [Juntawong et al., 2014]), as any mRNA with one or more ribosomes bound to it will be purified by TRAP. Also, since TRAP relies on epitope-tagging and the tag may interfere with the function of the ribosome, the regulation of translation of some mRNAs may be disrupted in the TRAP transgenic lines, e.g., due to a reduced ability of the tagged ribosome to associate with specific proteins at certain stages of translation. Another limitation of TRAP is that it typically uses a specific redundant isoform of a ribosomal protein for tagging, such as RPL18, and thus likely purifies only a subset of ribosomes that carry just that RPL18 variant. Given that there are multiple RPL18-like proteins in plant genomes, using one specific ribosomal protein isoform for tagging misses the ribosomes that utilize an alternative RPL18 isoform.
The method of choice for our studies, the Ribo-seq, does not involve transgenic line generation nor affinity purification, thus avoiding many of the limitations of the aforementioned earlier techniques. Most importantly, the single-codon resolution of the ribosome footprinting technology allows researchers to map the ribosomes on the mRNAs and thus clearly distinguish between the transcripts harboring productive ribosomes translating the main genic open reading frames versus transcripts associated with non-productive ribosomes arrested in the 5’UTRs. Not only does this method offer a snapshot of a whole-genome view of ribosomal distribution at an unprecedented resolution, it also enables the true quantitative measure of translational efficiency of every expressed gene in the genome by correlating the Ribo-seq data with the transcriptional information obtained via RNA-seq. Nonetheless, even the Ribo-Seq has its own drawbacks, as it cannot discriminate between mRNA subpopulations with different translation efficiencies, giving an average translation efficiency readout for each expressed gene.
Herein, we provide a plant-optimized Ribo-seq protocol that enables the study of translation regulation through the isolation of high-quality ribosomal footprints from different developmental stages of in vitro grown Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings. It describes step by step how to pellet and digest polysomes, isolate monosomes, extract the mRNA footprints, and generate sequencing libraries for the Illumina platform. The protocol also describes the preparation of parallel RNA-seq libraries to account for transcriptional regulation. We conclude the description of our method with a brief summary of how to analyze the sequencing results.
Materials and Reagents
-
Materials
-
Miracloth
-
30 ml NalgeneTM High-Speed polycarbonate centrifuge tubes (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Thermo ScientificTM, catalog number: 3118-0030 ) (or equivalent) to centrifuge the plant extracts
-
5 ml polypropylene thin-wall ultracentrifuge tubes (Beckman Coulter, catalog number: 326819 )
-
10 ml ultracentrifuge 14 x 89 mm tubes with isopycnic caps (BioComp Instruments, catalog number: 105-914A )
-
Fine scale
-
10 ml syringe
-
Cannula to be attached to the syringe (Thomas Scientific, catalog number: 1193G13 )
-
Pre-sterilized, RNase-free 5 ml, 1 ml, 200 µl and 10 µl micropipette tips
-
Pre-sterilized, RNase-free 2 ml and 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tubes
-
15 and 50 ml Falcon tubes
-
Stoppers to secure the lids of 1.5 ml tubes
-
Razor blades
-
Dynabeads mRNA Purification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, AmbionTM, catalog number: 610-06 )
-
2 ml microcentrifuge tubes
-
1.5 ml non-stick, RNase-free microtubes (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Applied BiosystemsTM, catalog number: AM12450 )
-
MyOneTM Streptavidin C1 DynaBeads® (Thermo Fisher Scientific, InvitrogenTM, catalog number: 65601 )
-
200 μl PCR strip tubes
-
Reagents
-
Liquid nitrogen
-
RNase-free, sterile, MilliQ water
-
Tris base
-
Sucrose
-
Potassium chloride (KCl)
-
Sodium chloride (NaCl)
-
Magnesium chloride (MgCl2)
-
Ethyleneglycol-bis(2-aminoethylether)-N,N,N’,N-tetraacetic acid (EGTA)
-
Ethylene diamintetracetic acid (EDTA)
-
Dithiothreitol (DTT)
-
Brij-35 [Polyoxyethylene(23)lauryl ether]
-
Triton X-100
-
Igepal CA 630 (Octylphenyl-polyethylene glycol)
-
Tween 20 (Polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate 20)
-
Cycloheximide (see Note 1)
-
Chloramphenicol (see Note 1)
-
Lithium chloride (LiCl)
-
Sodium acetate (NaOAc)
-
Sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3)
-
Sodium carbonate (Na2CO3)
-
Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)
-
Sodium hydroxide (NaOH)
-
Trisodium citrate (Na3C6H5O7)
-
Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), PCR grade
-
Ethanol, molecular biology grade
-
Water-saturated, acid phenol, molecular biology grade (see Note 2)
-
Chloroform, molecular biology grade (see Note 2)
-
Isoamyalcohol
-
Isopropanol, molecular biology grade
-
PEG8000
-
15 mg/ml GlycoBlueTM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, InvitrogenTM, catalog number: AM9515 )
-
10 bp DNA ladder (Thermo Fisher Scientific, InvitrogenTM, catalog number: 10821015 )
-
2x denaturing sample buffer with dye (Thermo Fisher Scientific, InvitrogenTM, catalog number: LC6876 ) (see Note 3)
-
SYBR® Gold, 10,000x in DMSO (Thermo Fisher Scientific, InvitrogenTM, catalog number: S11494 ) (see Note 4)
-
dNTP mix, 10 mM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, InvitrogenTM, catalog number: 18427-013 )
-
OmniPur® polyethylene glycol 8000 (EMD Millipore, Calbiochem®, catalog number: 6510 )
-
Universal miRNA cloning linker (New England Biolabs, catalog number: S1315S )
-
Boric acid
-
Acetic acid
-
12-well 15% polyacrylamide TBE-Urea gels (Bio-Rad Laboratories, catalog number: 4566055 ) (see Note 5)
-
30% acrylamide/bisacrylamide (29:1) (Bio-Rad Laboratories, catalog number: 161-0156 ) (see Note 5)
-
Ammonium persulfate (APS)
-
TEMED (N,N,N’,N’-Tetramethylethane-1,2-diamine) (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: T7024 )
-
Glycerol
-
Bromophenol blue
-
Enzymes
-
SUPERase-InTM RNase inhibitor (Thermo Fisher Scientific, AmbionTM, catalog number: AM2694 )
-
TURBOTM DNase (2 U/μl) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, AmbionTM, catalog number: AM2238 )
-
RNase I (100 U/μl) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, InvitrogenTM, catalog number: AM2294 )
-
SuperScript® III reverse transcriptase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, InvitrogenTM, catalog number: 18080-093 )
-
T4 polynucleotide kinase, T4 PNK4 (New England Biolabs, catalog number: M0201 ), supplied with 10x T4 PNK buffer (New England Biolabs, catalog number: B0201 ) (see Note 6)
-
T4 RNA ligase 2, truncated (New England Biolabs, catalog number: M0242 ), supplied with PEG 8000 50% and 10x T4 Rnl2 buffer
-
Phusion high-fidelity DNA polymerase (2 U/μl) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Thermo ScientificTM, catalog number: F-530S )
-
CircLigaseTM ssDNA ligase (100 U/μl) (Epicentre, catalog number: CL4115K )
-
Oligonucleotides
-
Reverse transcription primer for split-adapter circularization (see Note 7)
NI-NI-9: [P]AGATCGGAAGAGCGTCGTGTAGGGAAAGAGTGTAGATCTCGGTGGTCGC[SC18]CACTCA[SC18]TTCAGACGTGTGCTCTTCCGATCTATTGATGGTGCCTACAG (Ingolia et al., 2009)
-
Size marker oligos (Ingolia et al., 2009) (see Note 8)
oNTI265: rArUrGrUrArCrArCrGrGrArGrUrCrGrArGrCrUrCrArArCrCrCrGrCrArArCrGrCrGrA
oNTI268: rArUrGrUrArCrArCrGrGrArGrArCrCrCrGrCrArArCrGrCrGrA
-
rRNA subtraction oligos (all the oligos here have a 5’ TEG-linked biotin and were obtained from IDT),These oligos are based on the most abundant rRNA sequences and transposons that were found using 3-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings and the ribosome footprinting protocol described herein (see Note 9)
rRNABio1: 5’-gataaccgtagtaattctagag-3’
rRNABio2&4: 5’-TGATTCATGATAACTCGACGGACGACGCGGATTACGGTGGCGGC-3’
rRNABio5&3: 5’-GTCGCTGCCGTGATCGTGGTCTCCATCGAGTCTTTGAACGCAAG-3’
Bio-Tranpos: 5’-GAGGGATGCAACACGAGGAGTTCCCGGGAGGTCA-3’
Bio-5S: 5’-AAGCCTTCTGGCCGAGGGCACGTCTGCCTGGGTGTCACAA-3’
Bio-18S: 5’-AAGGTTTCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGGAAGGATCATTG-3’
-
Amplification primers
NI-NI-2: 5’-AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACAC-3’ (Ingolia et al., 2009)
NI-NI-3: 5’-CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGATAGTCGTGTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTTCCG-3’ (Ingolia et al., 2009)
Alternative indexed primers
Index 1:
5’-CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGATCGTGATGTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTTCCG-3’
Index 2:
5’-CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGATACATCGGTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTTCCG-3’
Index 3:
5’-CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGATGCCTAAGTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTTCCG-3’
Index 4:
5’-CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGATTGGTCAGTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTTCCG-3’
Index 5:
5’-CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGATCACTGTGTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTTCCG-3’
Index 6:
5’-CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGATATTGGCGTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTTCCG-3’
Index 7:
5’-CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGATGATCTGGTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTTCCG-3’
-
Solutions
All solutions should be prepared with RNase-free, MilliQ water. Unless otherwise stated, all of them must be sterilized by autoclaving for at least 20 min and stored at room temperature.
-
1 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.0 (see Note 10)
-
1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.0 (see Note 10)
-
1 M Tris-HCl, pH 9.0 (see Note 10)
-
1 M sucrose, prepared from Molecular Biology grade sucrose (autoclave for 10 min)
-
1 M KCl
-
5 M NaCl
-
1 M MgCl2
-
0.5 M EGTA, pH 8.0 (see Note 11)
-
0.5 M EDTA, pH 8.0 (see Note 11)
-
2 mM EDTA, 100 mM Na2CO3
-
2 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaHCO3
-
3 M NaOAc, pH 5.5
-
10% SDS (w/v)
-
1 M NaOH (no sterilization required)
-
4 M LiCl (filter-sterilize, do not autoclave)
-
1 M DTT (do not autoclave; aliquot and store at -20 °C)
-
100 mg/ml cycloheximide, prepared in DMSO (filter-sterilize; aliquot and store at -20 °C)
-
50 mg/ml chloramphenicol, prepared in ethanol (filter-sterilize; aliquot and store at -20 °C)
-
Detergent mix 20% (w/v or v/v) of each of four detergents in water (Brij-35, Triton X-100, Igepal CA 630 and Tween 20)
-
50% PEG8000 (w/v), prepared by combining dry PEG with water in a 50 ml conical and mixing with gentle shaking overnight. No sterilization is required. PEG is very hygroscopic; so start adding PEG to less than half of the final volume of MilliQ water. Then, after it is dissolved, add more water if needed. PEG used for ligation (step C3) should not be more than 1 month old.
-
10% APS (w/v), Filter-sterilize and aliquot in small volumes (e.g., 500 µl). Store at -20 °C. Aliquots can be thawed and re-frozen several times.
-
Buffers (see Recipes)
-
Polysome extraction buffer (PEB)
-
Sucrose cushion A (SCA)
-
Sucrose gradients solutions
-
Polysome digestion buffer (PDB)
-
Sucrose cushion B (SCB)
-
Polysome resuspension buffer (PRB)
-
Total RNA extraction buffer (TREB)
-
Alkaline fragmentation buffer (2x)
-
Alkaline fragmentation stop/precipitation solution
-
TAE (Tris/acetate/EDTA buffer) (50x)
-
TBE (Tris/borate/EDTA buffer) buffer (5x)
-
RNA gel extraction buffer (GEB)
-
DNA gel extraction buffer (STE)
-
SSC (20x)
-
Subtraction bind/wash buffer (2x)
-
8% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel (12 ml)
-
Non-denaturing loading dye (6x)
Equipment
-
7-9 cm diameter porcelain mortar and pestle
-
Small (30-50 ml) glass beakers
-
Refrigerated Beckman Avanti J-25 centrifuge and Beckman JA17 rotor (or equivalent)
-
Ultracentrifuge Beckman L8-70M (or equivalent) with swinging bucket rotors for polysome pelleting (Beckman Coulter, model: SW55Ti ) and sucrose gradient centrifugation (Beckman Coulter, model: SW41Ti or Thermo Fisher Scientific, Thermo ScientificTM, model: TH-641 ).
-
Automatic P1000, P200 and P10 micropipettes
-
Refrigerated tabletop microcentrifuge
-
Orbital shaker
-
Gradient Master Station, with both the gradient maker and the fractionation station (BioComp Instruments)
-
Continuous UV light monitor (Bio-Rad Laboratories, model: EM-1 Econo UV Monitor )
-
Fractionator (Gilson, model: FC203B )
-
Nanodrop (or another spectrophotometer to quantify nucleic acid concentrations in small volumes of RNA)
-
Nutator shaker
-
Thermoblock
-
Fume hood
-
Mini-PROTEAN tetra cell polyacrylamide gel box (Bio-Rad Laboratories, catalog number: 165-8004 ) or equivalent and electrophoresis power supply
-
UV transilluminator
-
Vortex
-
DynaMagTM-2 magnetic separation rack (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog number: 12321D )
-
Thermocycler
-
2100 BioAnalyzer (Agilent Technologies, catalog number: G2940CA )
-
HiSeq2000 (Illumina)
Procedure
The wet-lab protocol is divided into A, B, and C steps (see Figure 1 for an overview). A steps regard to the preparation of the ribosome footprints. B steps refer to the total mRNA isolation procedure. C steps represent the part of the protocol where the footprints and mRNA fragments are processed together to create the sequencing libraries. The order in which A and B steps are performed is up to the researcher.
Tissues need to be flash-frozen after the desired treatment, ground to a very fine powder in liquid nitrogen, and then stored in -80 °C until use. 0.5 g of this pulverized tissue is required for the ribosome footprints and 0.5-1 g are needed to prepare the mRNA fragments. It is good practice to first isolate polysomes without including the digestion step to ensure that intact polysomes are being isolated before proceeding to the preparation of the footprint libraries. As with all RNA protocols, the tissues should not be allowed to thaw in the absence of buffer at any moment and all materials and solutions need to be RNase free. All the work should be performed on ice, unless otherwise stated.
These protocols allow for the generation of ready-to-sequence Ribo-seq and RNA-seq libraries from frozen ground tissues in 9 days. The entire protocol is organized in working days. At the end of the protocol, we include a Data analysis section that describes the pipeline that leads to the identification of genes regulated at the level of translation by the treatment or mutation of interest.

Figure 1. Overview of the ribosome footprinting procedure. A. Blue panel: steps that are specific to ribosome footprinting; B. Green panel: steps specific to mRNA library preparation; C. Yellow panel: steps that are common to both types of libraries. A, B and C steps are also marked in the written protocol.
-
Steps: Ribosome footprinting
Figure 2 shows a flow chart of the procedure comprising the A steps.

Figure 2. Overview of the A steps of the protocol
Data analysis
The bioinformatic analysis described herein for the study of translation regulation using ribosome footprinting data follows the pipeline described in Merchante et al. (2015). The inputs for this pipeline are the de-multiplexed Ribo-seq and RNA-seq datasets (fastq-files) from Illumina HiSeq2000 platform, the TAIR 10 Arabidopsis genome sequence, and TAIR 10 Arabidopsis gene models (https://www.arabidopsis.org/).
-
General data preprocessing
-
Using FASTX-Toolkit (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/), remove adaptor sequences and trim low-quality regions.
-
Align reads to the Arabidopsis thaliana genome sequence using Tophat2 (https://ccb.jhu.edu/software/tophat/index.shtml).
-
Select uniquely mapping, sense-orientation reads in the size range of 20-40 nt, discard alignments with more than two mismatches, and create read count summaries of coding (CDS) regions.
-
Assessment of periodicity for quality control
Ribosome footprints, but not the RNA-seq reads, should
show a strong 3 nt periodicity, which represents the codon-long step-wise
movement of the ribosome along the mRNA (Ingolia et al., 2009; Merchante et al.,
2015). So, the presence of this periodicity can be used as a control of the
quality of the footprints. To avoid edge effects, restrict analysis to the
genes with 5’ and 3’ UTRs longer than 70 nt and CDSs longer than 150 nt. To
avoid ambiguities with respect to the location of reads along a transcript,
restrict analysis to reads of a fixed length - typically a value between 28 to
32 nt, determined by visual inspection (C1 steps) - that map in sense
orientation to only one transcript.
-
Transform genomic read coordinates into transcript coordinates.
-
Visualize read distribution in the vicinity of the CDS start: project the selected reads into the common coordinate system of a ‘metagene’. Bin the transcript coordinates of the read start points using their relative location with respect to the start of the main open reading frame: a read that starts at the beginning of the CDS falls into bin ‘0’. To visualize the read distribution around the end of the CDS, proceed analogously but bin with respect to the end of the main open reading frame.
-
Normalize the histogram of read start positions by the total number of reads selected and draw a region around bin ‘0’.
-
edgeR analysis of differential transcription and translation
-
Discard genes with small read counts (rpkm value smaller than 3 in any of the samples) and perform TMM normalization (Robinson and Oshlack, 2010).
-
Model the experiment by a 2-factorial design, where factor one is, for example, ethylene/control treatment and factor two is RNA-seq/Ribo-seq treatment. Use the generalized linear models approach (glm edgeR) of the Bioconductor package edgeR (Robinson et al., 2010) to select genes that, in this example, i) respond to ethylene on the RNA level, ii) respond to ethylene on the footprint level, and iii) respond differently to ethylene on the RNA-level and the footprint level. Determine the false discovery rate using Benjamini and Hochberg’s method (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995).
-
Analysis of changes in
translational efficiency
-
Following the definition of Ingolia and colleagues (Ingolia et al., 2009), compute translational efficiency (TE) as the fraction of Ribo-seq footprint rpkm value over RNA-seq rpkm value: TE = rpkm(foot)/rpkm(mRNA).
-
Compute log2-transformed TE-values of ethylene-treated plants and subtract corresponding control values: ΔTE = log2 (TEethylene) - log2 (TEcontrol)
-
Compute z-score of ΔTE: zΔTE= (ΔTE-E[ΔTE])/√Var(ΔTE). Determine the false discovery rate using the R package fdrtool (Strimmer, 2008).
Notes
-
Cycloheximide and chloramphenicol are very toxic and harmful to the environment.
-
Both phenol and chloroform are acute toxins. Handle them in a fume hood and wear proper protection.
-
The 2x denaturing sample buffer with dye contains formamide, which is a reproductive toxin. Use proper protection when handling it.
-
Nucleic acid stains are typically mutagenic, use proper protection when handling them.
-
Both acrylamide and bisacrylamide are neurotoxins, use proper protection when handling them.
-
Make sure not to confound the proper T4 PNK (M0201) with the T4 Polynucleotide Kinase 3’ phosphatase minus (M0236) as with the latter one the ligation step will not work.
-
[P] represents 5’-phosphorylation and [SC18] represents a hexa-ethyleneglycol spacer.
-
‘r’ indicates that these are RNA oligonucleotides.
-
These oligos may need to be re-designed if different treatments, growth conditions, developmental stages, footprinting protocols, etc., are used.
-
This protocol requires Tris-HCl at pH 7.5, 7.8, 8.0, 8.4, 8.8 and 9.0, but all intermediate-concentration Tris-HCl buffers can be made out of the Tris-HCl pH7.0, 8.0 and 9.0 listed here.
-
EGTA and EDTA only dissolve after adjusting the pH.
-
There will be foam due to the use of detergents. Make sure to collect all the bubbles as well.
-
When preparing the aliquots, allow some excess as the solution is very viscous. 1.2 ml aliquots work well for two samples.
-
The SW55Ti rotor allows spinning 6 samples at the same time, so a maximum of 3 ml of SCA will be needed per centrifugation round.
-
Such as a 5 ml ultracentrifuge tube or a 15 ml Falcon tube.
-
This step is necessary because the debris pellet can easily get dislodged if supernatant is not transferred to a different tube rapidly at the end of the spin; failure to transfer the supernatant immediately will result in carryover of the debris and compromise ultracentrifugation.
-
Sucrose gradients can also be prepared at the monosome pelleting centrifuge-step A2.7.
-
Approximately half of the tube.
-
The polysome pellet will be clear if using etiolated seedlings and dark green if photosynthetic tissues are employed.
-
If there is a control tube that is not going to be digested, do not add the RNase I to it and keep it on ice until digestion time is over.
-
Be extra-careful when doing this to not disturb the gradient.
-
If using 1.5 ml tubes to heat the phenol:chloroform, do not allow the temperature to get higher than 65 °C and secure the lids, as, due to the pressure, the lids can open quite easily and produce dangerous spills, leading to the loss of precious samples.
-
Phenol alone can also be used to extract the RNA, but if this is the case, the aqueous phase can be the lower one due to the high concentration of sucrose in the extract.
-
Other standard RNA extraction methods (e.g., Trizol) compatible with high-throughput sequencing library construction and next-gen sequencing can also be used.
-
Phenol:Chloroform:Isoamylalcohol (25:24:1) can also be used.
-
JA17 tubes in the Beckman Avanti J-25 can also be used.
-
If using 2 ml centrifuge tubes, add 500 μl of extract to different microtubes prefilled with 50 μl 3 M sodium acetate pH 5.2, mix and add 1,375 μl of ethanol.
-
34,895 x g if the Beckman centrifuge is used.
-
At this step, samples can be left overnight at 4 °C if necessary.
-
The stop solution already contains 300 mM salt, so no more salt is needed to precipitate the RNA.
-
It is easier to select the size if the samples are surrounded by the oligos, so, run two oligo lanes, at the beginning and end of the gel.
-
The time of the run has to be determined empirically depending on the running cell. It is a good practice to start running a test with the primers. As a reference, for the first run do not let the lower blue band from the denaturing sample buffer run out of the gel. Note the position of the marker primers with respect to the dye and adjust the future run times to the primer test.
-
The gel piece does not disintegrate or change appearance.
-
Allow a relatively high excess as the mix is very viscous and difficult to pipette.
-
If the room-temperature incubation is followed by an overnight incubation at 4 °C, ligation efficiency increases.
-
As a reference, the ligated samples typically run just above the higher blue band of the sample buffer.
-
When the primer is present in vast excess, there is increased background from unextended primer that can, in some cases, dominate the actual library products. It is best to determine the right proportion empirically. 1-2 μl of NI-NI-9 primer at 1.25 μM should work fine. This can be tested in the gel run afterwards: the unextended primer should still be present after the RT step, but the extended libraries should not be fainter than the primer itself.
-
The circularized libraries were resuspended in 20 µl and only 10 µl are used for the subtractive hybridization step. Keep the remaining 10 µl at -80 °C as a back-up.
-
The buffer conditions in the subtractive hybridization (high salt as well as citrate, which chelates magnesium) are incompatible with PCR and thus precipitation is required after the subtraction step.
-
Look for the cycle number that results in the best amplification without a significant loss of primers, so that there won’t be competition between sequences for the primers. The conditions are usually stable between experiments. Therefore, once the optimal conditions have been determined for a subset of samples, they also prove suitable for other samples from different experiments. In our case, the best amplification was achieved at 14 cycles, and further tests with additional samples confirmed 14 cycles as optimal, negating the need for further optimization.
-
Keep the rest of the PCR as a back-up.
Recipes
-
Polysome extraction buffer (PEB)
110 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.8
100 mM sucrose
100 mM KCl
75 mM NaCl
20 mM MgCl2
12.5 mM EGTA
3 mM DTT
6.25 μl/ml detergent mix
25 μl/ml Triton X-100
37.5 μg/ml cycloheximide
25 μg/ml chloramphenicol
Prepare fresh before the extraction and keep on ice until use
-
Sucrose cushion A (SCA)
1.75 M sucrose
400 mM Tris-HCl, pH 9.0
200 mM KCl
5 mM EGTA
35 mM MgCl2
5 mM DTT
50 μg/ml cycloheximide
50 μg/ml chloramphenicol
Prepare in advance (minus DTT and antibiotics). Autoclave no longer than 15 min, make 1.2 ml aliquots and store at -20 °C. Add the last three compounds fresh for each experiment before use.
-
Sucrose gradients solutions
50%/10% (w/v) sucrose
40 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.4
20 mM KCl
10 mM MgCl2
50 μg/ml cycloheximide
50 μg/ml chloramphenicol
1 μg/ml SUPERase-In
Prepare fresh on the day of the experiment
-
Polysome digestion buffer (PDB)
20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8
150 mM NaCl
5 mM MgCl2
50 μg/ml Triton X-100
1 mM DTT
100 μg/ml cycloheximide
12 μl TURBO DNase 2 U/μl per 4.5 ml of digestion volume
10 μl RNase I per 4.5 ml of digestion buffer
Prepare on the day of the extraction and keep on ice
-
Sucrose cushion B (SCB)
1.75 M sucrose
20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8
150 mM NaCl
5 mM MgCl2
5 mM DTT
50 μg/ml cycloheximide
50 μg/ml chloramphenicol
1 μl/ml SUPERase-In
Prepare in advance (minus the last four ingredients) and autoclave no longer than 15 min. Make 1.2 ml aliquots and store at -20 °C. Add the last four compounds fresh for each experiment before use.
-
Polysome resuspension buffer (PRB)
200 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.4
200 mM KCl
25 mM EGTA
35 mM MgCl2
50 μg/ml cycloheximide
50 μg/ml chloramphenicol
1 μl/ml SUPERase-In
Prepare the day of the extraction and keep in ice
-
Total RNA extraction buffer (TREB)
200 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0
400 mM LiCl
25 mM EDTA
1% SDS
Prepare in advance (the solution keeps for several months) and store at room temperature
-
Alkaline fragmentation buffer (2x)
2 mM EDTA
100 mM Na2CO3, pH 9.2
This solution is prepared by mixing 15 parts of 100 mM Na2CO3 with 110 parts of 100 mM NaHCO3. It will equilibrate with gaseous CO2 and raise in pH over time. It can be stored in tightly capped, single-use aliquots at room temperature for over a year.
-
Alkaline fragmentation stop/precipitation solution
60 μl 3 M NaOAc
2 μl GlycoBlue 15 mg/ml
500 μl RNase-free water per reaction
Prepare right before use
-
TAE (Tris/acetate/EDTA buffer) (50x)
2 M Tris base
1 M acetic acid
50 mM EDTA
-
TBE (Tris/Borate/EDTA buffer) (5x)
445 mM Tris base
445 mM boric acid
10 mM EDTA
Dilute the concentrated stock buffer to 1x right before use.
-
RNA gel extraction buffer (GEB)
300 mM NaOAc, pH 5.5
1 mM EDTA
0.25% SDS
-
DNA gel extraction buffer (STE)
300 mM NaCl
10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0
1 mM EDTA
-
SSC (20x)
3 M NaCl
300 mM trisodium citrate (Na3C6H5O7)
Adjusted to pH 7.0 with HCl
-
Subtraction bind/wash buffer (2x)
400 μl 5 M NaCl
2 μl 0.5 M EDTA
10 μl 1 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.5
590 μl water
-
8% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel (12 ml)
6.3 ml MilliQ water
3.2 ml 30% acrylamide/bisacrylamide
2.4 ml of 5x TBE
84 μl of 10% APS
10 μl TEMED
-
Non-denaturing loading dye (6x)
60% (v/v) glycerol
0.03% (w/v) bromophenol blue
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NSF grants MCB 1158181 and 0519869 to J.M.A.; MCB 0923727 to J.M.A. and A.N.S.; IOS 1444561 to J.M.A., A.N.S., and S.H.; NCSU-RISF to S.H. and J.M.A.; and a Marie Curie COFUND U-Mobility postdoctoral fellowship to C.M. (co-funded by the University of Malaga and the EU 7FP GA N_246550). We are grateful to Nick Ingolia for his help with implementing and troubleshooting this protocol in plants.
References
-
Branco-Price, C., Kaiser, K. A., Jang, C. J., Larive, C. K. and Bailey-Serres, J. (2008). Selective mRNA translation coordinates energetic and metabolic adjustments to cellular oxygen deprivation and reoxygenation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 56(5): 743-755.
-
Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 57: 125-133.
-
Ingolia, N. T., Ghaemmaghami, S., Newman, J. R. and Weissman, J. S. (2009). Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science 324(5924): 218-223.
-
Ingolia, N. T., Brar, G. A., Rouskin, S., McGeachy, A. M. and Weissman, J. S. (2013). Genome-wide annotation and quantitation of translation by ribosome profiling. Curr Protoc Mol Biol Chapter 4: Unit 4 18.
-
Juntawong, P., Girke, T., Bazin, J. and Bailey-Serres, J. (2014). Translational dynamics revealed by genome-wide profiling of ribosome footprints in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111(1): E203-212.
-
Li, R., Sun, R., Hicks, G. R. and Raikhel, N. V. (2015). Arabidopsis ribosomal proteins control vacuole trafficking and developmental programs through the regulation of lipid metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(1): E89-98.
-
Mustroph, A., Juntawong, P. and Bailey-Serres, J. (2009). Isolation of plant polysomal mRNA by differential centrifugation and ribosome immunopurification methods. Methods Mol Biol 553: 109-126.
-
Merchante, C., Brumos, J., Yun, J., Hu, Q., Spencer, K. R., Enriquez, P., Binder, B. M., Heber, S., Stepanova, A. N. and Alonso, J. M. (2015). Gene-specific translation regulation mediated by the hormone-signaling molecule EIN2. Cell 163(3): 684-697.
-
Missra, A. and von Arnim, A. G. (2014). Analysis of mRNA translation states in Arabidopsis over the diurnal cycle by polysome microarray. Methods Mol Biol 1158: 157-174.
-
Reynoso, M. A., Juntawong, P., Lancia, M., Blanco, F. A., Bailey-Serres, J. and Zanetti, M. E. (2015). Translating Ribosome Affinity Purification (TRAP) followed by RNA sequencing technology (TRAP-SEQ) for quantitative assessment of plant translatomes. Methods Mol Biol 1284: 185-207.
-
Reuber, T. L. and Ausubel, F. M. (1996). Isolation of Arabidopsis genes that differentiate between resistance responses mediated by the RPS2 and RPM1 disease resistance genes. Plant Cell 8(2): 241-249.
-
Robinson, M. D. and Oshlack, A. (2010). A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol 11(3): R25.
-
Robinson, M., McCarthy, D., and Smyth, G. (2010). edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26(1):139-40.
-
Strimmer, K. (2008). A unified approach to false discovery rate estimation. BMC Bioinformatics 9: 303.
-
Zanetti, M. E., Chang, I. F., Gong, F., Galbraith, D. W. and Bailey-Serres, J. (2005). Immunopurification of polyribosomal complexes of Arabidopsis for global analysis of gene expression. Plant Physiol 138(2): 624-635.
Please login or register for free to view full text
View full text
Download PDF
Q&A
Copyright: © 2016 The Authors; exclusive licensee Bio-protocol LLC.
How to cite: Merchante, C., Hu, Q., Heber, S., Alonso, J. and Stepanova, A. N. (2016). A Ribosome Footprinting Protocol for Plants.
Bio-protocol 6(21): e1985. DOI:
10.21769/BioProtoc.1985.