3.4. Risk assessment of bias and quality assessment
This protocol is extracted from research article:
Effectiveness of different types of skin grafting for treating venous leg ulcers
Medicine (Baltimore), Apr 16, 2021; DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025597

Two review authors will independently use Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool to appraise the risk of bias of each included study.[18] Any discrepancy between two reviewers will be resolved by discussion and a third reviewer where necessary. Meanwhile, we followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach proposed by Salanti and colleagues to assess the certainty of evidence from the network meta-analysis for each network contrast and the ranking of intervention groups: the overall certainty could be rated from high, moderate, low to very low.[19]

Note: The content above has been extracted from a research article, so it may not display correctly.



Q&A
Please log in to submit your questions online.
Your question will be posted on the Bio-101 website. We will send your questions to the authors of this protocol and Bio-protocol community members who are experienced with this method. you will be informed using the email address associated with your Bio-protocol account.



We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By using our website, you are agreeing to allow the storage of cookies on your computer.