A methodological quality assessment of studies was performed by 2 investigators (XZ and DL) independently using the PEDro scale.[9] The PEDro scale has demonstrated acceptable validity and reliability among physiotherapy trials[10] and was selected due to its high interrater reliability and strong convergence with the Cochrane Back and Neck (CBN) risk of bias tool.[11,12] The scale evaluates 11 items including: inclusion criteria and source, random allocation, concealed allocation, similarity at baseline, subject blinding, therapist blinding, assessor blinding, completeness of follow up, intention-to-treat analysis, between-group statistical comparisons, and point measures and variability. Each item is rated as either a “yes” or “no” and the total PEDro score is tallied by the total number of “yes” items (excluding the inclusion criteria and source item). In a few instances, discrepancies regarding study qualification or methodological quality scores were resolved between investigators by discussion after scores/lists had been generated independently. In these cases the authors worked together to come to an agreement on inclusion/exclusion or quality score.

Note: The content above has been extracted from a research article, so it may not display correctly.

Please log in to submit your questions online.
Your question will be posted on the Bio-101 website. We will send your questions to the authors of this protocol and Bio-protocol community members who are experienced with this method. you will be informed using the email address associated with your Bio-protocol account.

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By using our website, you are agreeing to allow the storage of cookies on your computer.