2.4.10. Grading the quality of evidence
This protocol is extracted from research article:
The effects of health-preserving sports on the treatment of COVID-19
Medicine (Baltimore), Jan 15, 2021; DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024201

We will use the evidence quality rating method to evaluate the results obtained from this analysis. Five factors: bias, inconsistent, inaccurate, indirect, and publication bias; 4 evaluation levels: high, medium, low, and very low.

Note: The content above has been extracted from a research article, so it may not display correctly.



Q&A
Please log in to submit your questions online.
Your question will be posted on the Bio-101 website. We will send your questions to the authors of this protocol and Bio-protocol community members who are experienced with this method. you will be informed using the email address associated with your Bio-protocol account.



We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By using our website, you are agreeing to allow the storage of cookies on your computer.