Patients undergoing SWL for ureteric calculi in Nishi-Omiya Hospital, Japan, between January 1, 2013 and June 30, 2019, were screened for inclusion in this retrospective study. This study was approved by the Internal Review Board of Nishi-Omiya Hospital (approval no. #20191206-1). In total, 588 patients were initially included; 51 were excluded for the following reasons: ureteral stent or nephrostomy (n = 24); lack of follow-up (n = 13); multiple stones in 1 ureter (n = 9); and previous URS and/or SWL for the target stone (n = 5) (Fig. 1). Thus, 537 patients were included in the analysis. In total, 491 patients (91.4%) underwent computed tomography (CT) prior to SWL, but 46 patients did not.

Flow diagram outlining patient selection. URS ureteroscopy lithotripsy, SWL shock wave lithotripsy

The locations of ureteral stones were classified as proximal (U1), middle (U2), and distal ureter (U3). Patients were grouped according to the time to SWL as urgent (0–3 days), early (4–30 days), late (31–60 days), long-delayed (≥ 61 days), and asymptomatic (unknown). Ureteral wall thickness was measured at the stone site on preoperative non-contrast CT scans, as described previously [10].

Note: The content above has been extracted from a research article, so it may not display correctly.

Please log in to submit your questions online.
Your question will be posted on the Bio-101 website. We will send your questions to the authors of this protocol and Bio-protocol community members who are experienced with this method. you will be informed using the email address associated with your Bio-protocol account.

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By using our website, you are agreeing to allow the storage of cookies on your computer.