The meta-analysis was planned according to PICO format: the P-population included samples of patients with a mean baseline BMI between 30 and 40 kg/m² and with a minimum follow-up time of 12 months after the endoscopic or surgical intervention; LSG was considered as the I-intervention performed on the population involved and ESG was identified as the C-comparison; the main O-outcome evaluated was the difference between the procedures in terms of efficacy (expressed by the percentage of Excess of Weight Loss (%EWL) at 12 months); the secondary O-outcome was the difference between the procedures in terms of safety (expressed by the rate of peri-procedural major and/or minor adverse events).

Note: The content above has been extracted from a research article, so it may not display correctly.



Q&A
Please log in to submit your questions online.
Your question will be posted on the Bio-101 website. We will send your questions to the authors of this protocol and Bio-protocol community members who are experienced with this method. you will be informed using the email address associated with your Bio-protocol account.



We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By using our website, you are agreeing to allow the storage of cookies on your computer.