Perceived utility of the NURSE Statements and REMAP Framework.

EO Eriko Onishi
HI Hirono Ishikawa
KI Kaori Ito
SN Shunichi Nakagawa
YS Youkie Shiozawa
TU Takeshi Uemura
MY Misuzu Yuasa
KO Kei Ouchi
ask Ask a question
Favorite

We asked about the perceived clinical utility of the NURSE statements in typical clinical encounters in Japan. These questions employed a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Not at all, 2 = Somewhat, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Moderately, 5 = Very Much). We then asked for the most- and second-most useful statements, including their rationales (free text responses). We asked if the REMAP framework would be useful in the participants’ routine clinical encounters, using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Not at all, 2 = Somewhat, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Moderately, 5 = Very Much).

Do you have any questions about this protocol?

Post your question to gather feedback from the community. We will also invite the authors of this article to respond.

post Post a Question
0 Q&A